APHC010036982026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No. 381/2026 Between: 1. MOHAMMED ZEESAN, S/O KHALEEL UR RAHAMAN, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION SOFTWARE EMPLOYEE, R/O H.NO.29 NGO COLONY, ADAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU 2. IRSHAD BEGUM, W/O KHALEEL UR RAHAMAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.29, NGO COLONY, ADAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU 3. ARFAA, D/O SALEEM KOKAN AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O H2/29, AMANA APARTMENTS, FLAT NO.9 AKBARABATH 1ST STREET, KODAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. S A KARIMUNNISA, w/o not known, aged about not known, working as Sub Inspector, Mahila Urban Police Station, Chittoor, Chittoor District, Tirupati Distric ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, It is therefore prayed that this Honble Court maybe pleased to punish the Respondent/Contemnor for committing Contempt of Court by wilfully disobeying /violating this Honble Court Interim Order dated 17.10.2025 of this Honble Court passed by the Honble Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa in IA.No.2/2025 in CRLP.No.10854/2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N BHARATH SIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 has been filed by the Petitioners to punish the Respondent/Contemnor for committing wilful violation of the Order passed by this Court dated 17.10.2025 in IA No.2 of 2025 in Crl.P.No.10854 of 2025. At the time of hearing, Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that after completion of investigation with regard to the subject crime, the Police filed charge sheet before the concerned Trial Court and no further orders are necessary in this matter. Sri M.Bharat Simha Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through video conferencing and acceded to the submissions of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and would submit that liberty may be granted to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet. Considering the submissions made, this contempt case is closed. Petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy of challenging the charge sheet according to law, if so advised. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 03.03.2026 Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No.381 of 2026 03.03.2026 Mjl/*