SATISH PUROHIT S/O SHRI RAJENDRA PUROHIT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/732/2026 · 2026-01-19
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15579 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15579 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2309] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 732/2026 Satish Purohit S/o Shri Rajendra Purohit, Aged About 44 Years, R/o House No. 52-C, Jadgamba Nagar, Near Heerapura Power House, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal Mr. Birbal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 19/01/2026
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Satish Purohit S/o Shri Rajendra Purohit seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.306/2025 dated 16.05.2025 registered at P.S. Karnivihar, District – Jaipur (West), for the offence under Sections 8/22 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the
[2026:RJ-JP:2309] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-732/2026] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that second bail application of present petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 20.11.2025 with liberty to file after report of FSL. He further submitted that report of FSL dated 19.12.2025 is submitted by him and it indicated that the contraband recovered by police is methamphetamine. He also submitted that initially the police has registered a case as if MD drug was recovered. He also submitted that if the recovered contraband is methamphetamine then small quantity is 2gms and commercial quantity is 50gms. He also submitted that after investigation police has filed a charge-sheet. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report of FSL and same is taken on record. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On 15.05.2025 Rampal, Sub-Inspector P.S. Karnivihar along with police has intercepted present petitioner who was driving the scooty and on search, recovered a small packet and as per police, it was MDA drug. After drawing memo, it was found that the petitioner was possessing 12.94 gms of MDA drugs. On the basis of recovery, FIR No.306/2025 dated 16.05.2025 under Section 8/22 of NDPS Act was registered. The petitioner was arrested and a charge-sheet is filed. [2026:RJ-JP:2309] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-732/2026]
7. The first bail application of present petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 16.09.2025 and second on 20.11.2025. Now FSL report dated 19.12.2025 is filed by counsel for petitioner. It indicated that a light brown and white color crystallized sold substance was found to contain methamphetamine. On the basis of this FSL report, recovered contraband is methamphetamine. As per NDPS Act, the commercial quantity is 50gms or above, therefore the recovered quantity is more than small quantity but less than commercial quantity. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 9.
Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Satish Purohit S/o Shri Rajendra Purohit, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. [2026:RJ-JP:2309] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-732/2026] (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /01