Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15579 (MAD)

THULSAIBAI v. THE GREATER CHENNAI corporation commisisoner

WP/13050/2026 · 2026-04-08

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 13050 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 13050 of 2026 Thulasibai Petitioner(s) Vs 1. THE GREATER CHENNAI Corporation Commisisoner The Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Ponnamalle High Road, Park Town, Chennai-600 003 2.The Registrar Birth and Death Registration, Division 008, Zone -1, Public Health Department, The Greater Chennai Corporation, No.945A, Vallalar High Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai-600019 3.The Thasildhar Thiruvottiyur Taluk, Thiruvottiyur Chennai-600 019 4.The Village Administrative officer (VAO) Thiruvottiyur Chennai-600 019 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 16.03.2026 and direct the 2nd Respondent to Correct the Spouse name in petitioners Husbands Death Certificate dated 29.01.2026 as Sarojini (Wrongly Mentioned) instead of Thulasibai (Correct Name). For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Silambuselvan For Respondent: Mr.G.T.Subramanian for R1 & R2 Mr.K.Tippu Sulthan for R3 & R4 Government Advocate ORDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13050 of 2026 By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. This writ petition has been filed for a direction, directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 16.03.2026 and direct the 2nd Respondent to Correct the Spouse name in petitioners Husbands Death Certificate dated 29.01.2026 as Sarojini (Wrongly Mentioned) instead of Thulasibai (Correct Name). 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's husband Ramamoorthy died on 29.01.2026, however, in the death certificate, wife name is mentioned as Sarojini instead of Thulasibai, in this regard, the petitioner gave a representation on 16.03.2026 to the respondents 1 to 4, however, the same is pending without consideration till date. Hence, this writ petition. 4. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without going into the merits of the case directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.03.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the interested parties, if any. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of six https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13050 of 2026 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 08-04-2026 dhk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Commisisoner The Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Ponnamalle High Road, Park Town, Chennai-600 003 2.The Registrar Birth and Death Registration, Division 008, Zone -1, Public Health Department, The Greater Chennai Corporation, No.945A, Vallalar High Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai-600019 3.The Thasildhar Thiruvottiyur Taluk, Thiruvottiyur Chennai-600 019 4.The Village Administrative officer (VAO) Thiruvottiyur Chennai-600 019 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 13050 of 2026 M.DHANDAPANI J. dhk WP No. 13050 of 2026 08-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis