AMIT KUMAR SINGH @ GUDDU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4738/2026 · 2026-06-02
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15579 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15579 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 4738 of 2026
--- Amit Kumar Singh @ Guddu
… … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party(s)
---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party(s) : A.P.P.
--- 2/02.06.2026 Heard Mrs. J. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 241 of 2025.
It has been alleged that the daughter of the informant died at her matrimonial house in unnatural circumstances.
Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the allegations have been supported by the son of the deceased, but in the post-mortem report, no external or internal injuries could be found on the person of the deceased.
It has been submitted that in fact, the post-mortem report has not been able to ascertain the cause of death. Learned counsel submits that the marriage was solemnized 18-19 years back. Petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Regard being had to the above, the petitioner above named is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Godda in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 241 of 2025, subject to the condition that he shall remain physically present before the trial court on each and every date till the conclusion of trial, unless prevented by sufficient cause.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
02.06.2026. Suman/Nandin/-