RUKMANI KUMARI SHARMA W/O SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/987/2026 · 2026-01-27
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15577 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15577 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3465] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 987/2026 Rukmani Kumari Sharma W/o Shri Santosh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of 21A, Keshav Garden, Jamdoli, Agra Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. District Collector, Jaipur, Collectorate Circle, Banipark, Jaipur.
3. Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jln Marg, Jaipur
4. Director General, Anti-Corruption Bureau, J-9, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartik Agarwal with Ms. Priya Khushalani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 27/01/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 14.10.2025 (Annexure-P20), the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has specifically directed that after considering the settled position of law, if any representation is filed by the petitioner, the same be considered and disposed of by a speaking order within a period of four weeks.
[2026:RJ-JP:3465] (2 of 2) [CW-987/2026]
Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is compelled to file the present writ petition for compliance of the said order. It is also submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 14.10.2025, multiple representations were submitted by the petitioner on 24.10.2025 as well as on 06.11.2025. However, even after lapse of four weeks, as directed therein, the representations submitted by the petitioner are kept in abeyance. Heard. At this stage, on direction of the Court, Mr. Yash Joshi appearing for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG, accept notices on behalf of the respondents. Considering the aforesaid submissions, this Court directs respondent No. 1 to consider the said representations filed by the petitioner within 30 days of passing of this order, or if any fresh representation is filed by the petitioner within seven days of date of passing this order, the same shall be considered by way of a speaking order, within a period of 30 days of filing such representation, failing which the strict actions, included but not limited to initiation of contempt proceedings be taken against the competent authority. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /24