[2026:RJ-JP:4448] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 356/2026 Abhay Jayaswal Son Of Shri Pankaj Jayaswal, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Vaishno Devi Dharm Kanta, Nayla Road, Kanota Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Rohit Yadav Son Of Shri Lalman Yadav, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of C-163, ARG Puram, Nayla Road, Kanota, Jaipur City-East (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. G.A. Ms. Seema Shekhar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.931/2025 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 303(2) & 3(5) of BNS along with all subsequent proceedings arising out of it. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedents. It is submitted that parties have entered into a compromise in the spirit of Lok Adalat. Counsel contends that now, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the [2026:RJ-JP:4448] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-356/2026] aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 3. Complainant of this case is present in person and has duly been identified by his Counsel. Under his instructions, learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR and on that basis, impugned FIR along with subsequent proceedings arising out of it may be quashed. 4. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably so also the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.931/2025 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) along with all subsequent proceedings arising out of it, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /253