APHC010037322014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 18607/2014 Between: 1. SYED JAREENA BEGUM, W/O. RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 16-3-23,-PUSALA SUBBAIAH STREET, NEAR JANDA TREE, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK BADRUN, W/O. KHADIR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 14-4-45, POTHURI VARI THOTA, 4TH LANE, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE WAQF BOARD, VIJAYAWADA, REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 4TH FLOOR, IMDAD GHAR BUILDING, ONE TOWN, KALESHWARARAO MARKET, VIJAYAWADA. R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER 2 DT.02.02.2026 IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2017(WPMP NO.12839 OF 2017) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioners for construction of the building in D.No. 508/2, in an extent of 418 sq. yards and also 431 sq. yards situated at Vasavi Nagar, Guntur city, Guntur district, belongs to the petitioners respectively, in accordance with building bye laws issued in G.O.Ms. No. 168 dated 01.04.2012 under deemed permission, as illegal, arbitrary consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the construction of the building in the afore said site to be carried in accordance with building bye laws issued in G.O.Ms. No. 168 dated 01.04.2012 and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 4. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: It transpires from the facts that when this Writ Petition was listed on 02.02.2026 and 18.02.2026 there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. Having so recorded, this Court had directed the Registry on 18.02.2026, to list this Writ Petition today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also no one appears for the Writ Petitioner. 2. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.02.2026 Mnr 4 113 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.18607 OF 2014 Dt.23.02.2026 Mnr