Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15567 (GAU)

MD ABDUL SATTAR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./2937/2026 · 2026-09-30

Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210472026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2937/2026 MD ABDUL SATTAR AND ANR S/O LATE ABUL HUSSAIN, R/O VILLAGE NO 1 BHATIAKHALI, P S RUPAHIHAT, DISTRICT NAGAON, ASSAM 2: MD QUDRAT ALI S/O MD HURMAT ALI R/O VILLAGE KATHPARA P S RUPAHIHAT DISTRICT NAGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAUHATI HIGH COURT Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S HUSSAIN, A JUBARIA,MR. H RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 01.10.2026 Heard Mr. S Hussain, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Rupahihat PS Case No. 274/2026 registered under Sections308(6)/308(7)/317(4)/112/61(2)/318(4)/319(2)/351(2)/351(3)/3(5)/3(6 )/3(8)/3(9) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioners were arrested on 05.09.2026 was lodged by the police personnel of Rupahihat Police Station stating inter alia that without any authority and without any professional qualifications, the petitioners along with another have assembled themselves in and around the Police Station and is making a livelihood from the persons, who come to the Police Station for police work. It was also stated that the petitioners along with another use to lure the public and coerce them to file an FIR or to reach a settlement and in the process they received the money from them. 3. Upon hearing the Counsels for both the sides and upon consideration of the same, more so in view of the fact that no specific allegation is made against the petitioners and also no victim has been mentioned in the FIR to have been victimized by the petitioners, this Court enlarges the petitioners on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Nagaon under the following conditions: i) the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for. ii) the petitioners will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. Page No.# 3/3 iii) the petitioners will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court. 4. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant