Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15566 (BOM)

TAYUB AMIN SAYED AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/4725/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DTG 20-Wp-4725-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4725 OF 2026 Tayub Amin Sayed & Anr. … Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________ Adv. M.R. Chouhan for Petitioners. Mr. Shrikant V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. Mr. Mahendra Bagwe, PSI, Mahim Police Station, Mumbai, present. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 28th September 2026 P.C. : 1) Present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for registration of FIR on the basis of complaints dated 5th June 2026, 26th June 2026 and 12th August 2026, submitted with the concerned Police Station, of which cognizance is not taken, is not maintainable, in view of Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 798. 1.1) Petition is accordingly disposed off. ( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 1/1 DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR Digitally signed by DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR Date: 2026.10.05 16:03:25 +0530