Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15565 (AP)

Madamsetty Sivakumar v. Sri B.Srinivasulu

CC/2027/2013 · 2026-01-22

Battu Devanand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010038702013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2027/2013 Between: 1. MADAMSETTY SIVAKUMAR,, S/O RAMULU, D.NO.41-1/9-53, 4TH LANE, GOWTHAMI NAGAR, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI B SRINIVASULU, S/o Not known to the petitioner, aged not known to the petitioner, The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to issue Notice to the Respondent under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and to punish him for his wilful disobedience and neglect to implement the orders of this Hon'ble court in WP.No.4315/1996 dated 10th July, 1996 and the orders dated 28th June, 2013 in WPMP No.22555/2013 in W.P. No.18472 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 1093 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions directing the Respondent to restore forthwith 1+1 security to the person of the petitioner and an armed guard at the residence of the petitioner, pending disposal of Contempt Case. IA NO: 3 OF 2013(APPL 7582 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SINDHU KUMARI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Contempt Case No.2027 of 2013 ORDER: Sri D. Hanumantha Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the sole petitioner died on 14.07.2024 during the pendency of the contempt case. 2. Considering the relief sought in this contempt case, in my considered opinion, nothing survives for adjudication after the demise of the sole petitioner. 3. In view of the same, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. 4. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 23.01.2026 PGR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND C.C.No.2027 of 2013 Date: 23.01.2026 PGR