Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210312026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/995/2026 SRI PRANAB MANDAL S/O LATE PRADIP MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TUBUKI JARANI PO DAKHIN BELGURI PS RUPAHIHAT DISTRICT NAGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M HOQUE, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : AB/2188/2026 SRI PRANAB MANDAL SON OF LATE PRADIP MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TUBUKI JARANI P.O. DAKHIN BELGURI P.S. RUPAHIHAT DISTRICT NAGAON ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR M HOQUE Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER Date : 30.09.2026
Heard Mr. M. Hoque, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. RJ Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. By this application, the applicant has prayed for correction of the order dated 11.09.2026 passed in AB No. 2188/2026, in which the case number was wrongly reflected.
3. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that in the order, the case number recorded was Rupahihat PS Case No. 223/2026, whereas the correct case no. is Rupahihat PS Case No. 233/2026. This Court had gone through the same and finds that the said case number has been wrongly reflected in the
order inadvertently and as such the correction is made to the effect that in the said order dated 11.09.2026 Rupahihat PS Case No.223/2026 is wrongly reflected and the correct case number is Rupahihat PS Case No. 233/2026. As such, the case number stands corrected to Rupahihat PS Case No. 233/2026. This order will become part of the order dated 11.09.2026.
Page No.# 3/3
4. For the ends of justice, it is as such directed that the applicant should appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 days from the date of the
order.
5. I.A. is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant