SMT. SUNEETA DEVI v. RAM BHAWAN YADAV AND 2 OTHERS
A227/6006/2026 · 2026-05-17
Vikas Budhwar
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6006 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record.
2. Heard.
3. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents.
4. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a writ, order or direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Div.) Allahabad to decide the Application of 6C under order 39 rule-1 of C.P.C dated 17.10.2022 in Original Suit No.742/2022, within pending before it within stipulated time, as may deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court.
4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.
5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Div.) Allahabad to decide the Application of 6C under order 39 rule-1 of C.P.C dated 17.10.2022 in Original Suit No.742/2022, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal impediment. May 18, 2026 Ashu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kavindra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Vikas Budhwar,J.) Smt. Suneeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) Ram Bhawan Yadav And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad