[2026:RJ-JP:1916] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 724/2026 1. Vijay S/o Shri Devpal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Fulwada, P.S. Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). (Presently In Sub Jail At Gangapur City, District Gangapur City). 2. Vinod Kumar @ Pintu S/o Shri Ramesh Chand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bichhochh (Unchagaon), P.S. Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). (Presently In Sub Jail At Gangapur City, District Gangapur City). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 680/2026 Hukum Singh @ Hukamchand S/o Jauharilal @ Jorya, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Phulwada, Thana Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (Presently In Judicial Custody In Jail At Gangapur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Sharma with Mr. Akshat Sharma & Mr. Anoop Meena in CRLMB No.724/2026 Mr. G.L. Sharma with Mr. Shankar Lal in CRLMB No.680/2026 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/01/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:1916] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-724/2026] 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.26/2025 registered at Police Station Batoda, District Gangapur City for offence under Section 108 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioners is of that they were charging a very higher rate of interest for the money given by them to the brother of the complainant and in view of the charging higher rate of interest, the brother of the complainant has committed suicide. 5. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have been implicated in this criminal case with a false and fabricated facts so as to create pressure upon the accused-petitioners for not demanding money which they have given to family of the complainant. 6. It is further submitted that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet and the accused-petitioners are in custody for last more than one and half months. It is also submitted that trial of the case will take considerable time. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 8. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and considering [2026:RJ-JP:1916] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-724/2026] the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioners are in custody for last more than one and half months, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /268-269