Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15559 (JHR)

BHOLENATH PANDIT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4765/2026 · 2026-06-02

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15909 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4765 of 2026 ---- Bholenath Pandit @ Bholanath Pandit …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 02nd June, 2026 1. Heard Mr. Rahul Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. 2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.116 of 2025. 3. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier dismissed as withdrawn in B.A. No.9916 of 2025. 4. The petitioner and others were apprehended by the police and from their possessions mobiles and SIM Cards were recovered. They were suspected to be involved in the cyber-crime. 5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint against this petitioner. It has further been submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against him. The petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2025. 6. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Regard being had to the period of custody, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.116 of 2025 subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated: 02nd June, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 05.06.2026