BHAGSINGH SON OF SHRI BHIMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/308/2026 · 2026-02-12
Bhuwan Goyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15557 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15557 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 308/2026 Bhagsingh Son Of Shri Bhimsingh, Resident Of Hadauli, Tehsil Mandawar, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Rajnikant Meena Son Of Shri Babulal, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Katheda, Police Station Khedli, District Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 12/02/2026
1. Complainant-respondent No.2 is present in person and has duly been identified by his counsel.
2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.77/2024 registered at Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC along with criminal proceedings arising out of it.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has entered into a compromise with the complainant. He submits that the complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR. A copy of compromise has been annexed with this petition.
[2026:RJ-JP:6757] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-308/2026]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the aforesaid factual position.
5. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal and the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC)4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.77/2024 registered at Police Station Mandawar (Dausa), District Dausa along with criminal proceedings arising out of it are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/47