IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11708 of 2026 Decided on: 15.07.2026 Rahul Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State Bank of India and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Notice not issued. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) In view of the fact that the employer of the late father of the petitioner is not a party-respondent in the present petition, as prayed for, this petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by impleading the employer also as a party respondent and making necessary averments against the said employer in the petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 15, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?