[2026:RJ-JP:2790] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 229/2026 1. Vishnu Maderna Son Of Shri Khargi, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Mahukhas, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 2. Anil Son Of Late Shri Haricharan, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Mahukhas, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) 3. Hemant Son Of Late Shri Ashok, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Mahukhas, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Narendra Kumar Tiwari Son Of Shri Subhash Tiwari, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Mahu Ibrahimpur, Tehsil Hindaun City, Police Station Nai Mandi Hindaun City, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Balveer Singh Beniwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/01/2026 1. Parties are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 2. The instant misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed for quashing of criminal proceedings pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hindaun City, Karauli in Case No.1286/2023 arising out of FIR No.75/2023 registered at [2026:RJ-JP:2790] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-229/2026] Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun, District Karauli for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. 3. After registration of the aforesaid FIR, the police conducted investigation in the matter and submitted charge-sheet before the concerned court for offences punishable under Sections 457 & 380 of IPC against the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have entered into a compromise in the spirit of Lok Adalat. It is submitted that learned Magistrate vide order dated 04.10.2023 took cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 380 & 457 of IPC. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. It is submitted that after passing of the said order, parties have entered into compromise. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 5. Learned State counsel and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 6. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal; considering the fact that petitioners and complainant have arrived at compromise and settled their dispute and in the view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the proceedings are liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:2790] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-229/2026] 7. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the criminal proceedings pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hindaun City, Karauli in Case No.1286/2023 arising out of FIR No.75/2023 registered at Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun, District Karauli for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC are quashed and set aside on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. Consequence to follow. 8. Stay Application and pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /227