[2026:RJ-JP:5301] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1528/2025 Deepshikha Sharma W/o Late Shri Rajesh Ahujaaged, Aged About 35 Years, having Aadhar No. - 2931 9425 8700, R/o Plot No. B- 98, Flat No. 301, Raghunandan Vihar, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Municipal Corporation Greater, Jaipur, Through Its Commissioner Having Its Office At Pandit Dindayal Uppadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Gausingha Mr. Ikhlash Mohd. Mr. Shankar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Harish Khandpal, Standing Counsel, Nagar Nigam HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 04/02/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to issue direction to the respondent to include the name of the petitioner as wife in the death certificate of Rajesh Ahuja by considering the representation of the petitioner. 2. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the material placed on record including the order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bharatpur in Criminal Misc. Case No.203/2024, the Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:5301] (2 of 2) [CW-1528/2025] 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent also states that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation alongwith her all credentials, the respondent-authority would consider and pass the appropriate order on the representation at earliest. 4. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel for the respondent, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a detailed representation showing her all credentials alongwith supporting documents to the respondent-authority within a period of a week from today. 5. In case, the respondent-authority receives any fresh representation from the petitioner, the same should be decided by the Competent Court within a period of 10 days from the date of receiving the representation by a reasoned and speaking order. 6. It goes without saying that in case the claim of the petitioner is found to be genuine, the relief as claimed be extended to the petitioner. 7. However, it is made clear that in case the decision of the representation goes adverse to the petitioner, she would free to avail appropriate remedy available to her under law so as to challenge the said order. 8. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /131