NIC Ltd. Vs. Anita Devi & ors. CMP No.13075, 13076 & 17301/2026 in FAO No.388/2005 14.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Shama, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for applicants/ respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Hemant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4 CMP No.17301 of 2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed by the applicants, wherein it has been mentioned that Bhaskar and Sachin is one and the same person and in this regard, the certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat, Jahu on 30.06.2026, which is annexed with the application as Annexure A-1, may be ordered to be taken on record. 2. Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the certificate Annexure A-1 is ordered to be taken on record. 3. The application stands disposed of. CMP No.13076 of 2026 4. The instant application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been filed on behalf of the applicant/respondent No.2- Sachin Verma, for discharging his natural guardian/ mother, i.e. respondent No.1-Anita Devi, as he has attained the age of majority. 5. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of the applicant as well as taking into consideration the fact that the applicant/respondent No.2 has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from the copy of his Matriculation Examination Certificate, annexed with the application as Annexure A-1, the same is allowed and his natural guardian/ mother, i.e. respondent No.1-Anita Devi, is ordered to be discharged from his guardianship and the applicant/ respondent No.2 is permitted to pursue the case in his own capacity. 6. The application stands disposed of. CMP No.13075 of 2026 7. The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed by applicant/respondent No.2- Bhaskar alias Sachin, for release of the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest, as per his share. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant. 8. No reply is intended to be filed to this application and the learned counsel for non-applicant/ appellant has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. 9. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant/respondent No.2, coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the awarded amount of compensation, alongwith up-to-date interest in favour of the applicant/respondent No.2, as per his share in the total awarded amount of compensation, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, after proper verification and identification by remitting the same to his bank account, details whereof have been given in para-7 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 15, 2026 (V.Himalvi)