Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6977 CRL.P No. 1830 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1830 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SRI. K.M. BANDI RANGAIAH, S/O MUDDARANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O NO 15, 5TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, T. DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560057 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMAR GOWDA K.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANJUNATH D.M., ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI. SOMASHEKARAIAH K.
S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O NO 69, 2ND CROSS, RAJAREDDY LAYOUT, BESIDE M.S. RAMAIAH ENCLAVE, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU - 560073 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAMACHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO RECALL THE
ORDER DATED 10.12.2020 MADE IN CRL.A.NO.893/2017, PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN CRIMINAL APPEAL AND CONFIRM THE
ORDER IN C.C.NO.11795/2013 PASSED BY XVIII ACMM, BENGALURU DATED 28.03.2017.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6977 CRL.P No. 1830 of 2022
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
The order sheet dated 04.02.2026 reads as under:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the criminal petition is not maintainable as the petitioner is seeking to set aside the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in Crl.A.No.893/2017. It is noticed that even the office has raised objection regarding maintainability of the petition. In view of the same, I do not find any reason to keep the petition pending when prima-facie the same is not maintainable. However, to afford opportunity to the petitioner or his counsel to convince the Court regarding maintainability of the petition and also on merits, list on 06.02.2026. I.A.No.1 of 2022 seeking interim order of stay is dismissed."
2. Sri. Amar Gowda. K.S, learned counsel submits that he is representing the petitioner as Sri. Manjunath D.M, learned counsel on record is no more.
3. Heard Sri. Amar Gowda. K.S, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Ramachandra, learned counsel for respondent.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6977 CRL.P No. 1830 of 2022
4. The petitioner being accused is seeking to recall the
judgment dated 10.12.2020 passed in Crl.App.No.893/2017 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by confirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.03.2017 passed in CC.No.11795/2013 by the XVIII ACMM, Bengaluru.
5. Virtually, the petitioner - accused is seeking to set aside the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in Crl.App.No.893/2017 by filing criminal petition which is not permissible under law.
6. Hence, the petition is dismissed as the same is not maintainable.
Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14