Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15545 (RAJ)

RANVIR SINGH BIJARNIA S/O MADAN LAL BIJARNIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/668/2026 · 2026-01-16

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1962] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 668/2026 Ranvir Singh Bijarnia S/o Madan Lal Bijarnia, R/o Panlava, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Police Station Balara, District Sikar (Raj.) At Present Resident Of 103-B, Kateva Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg Mr. Nonit Hatila For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Anirduh Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been ar- rested in connection with FIR No. 119/2023 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sec- tions 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC and Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and Sec- tion 21(3) of the Banning of Unregulated Deposits Schemes Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are tri- able by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 18.07.2023 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, [2026:RJ-JP:1962] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-668/2026] therefore considering the above facts the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the ac- cused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ranvir Singh Bijarnia S/o Madan Lal Bijarnia, in connection with FIR No. 119/2023 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar District Sikar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance be- fore the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police sta- tion. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the pres- ence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application [2026:RJ-JP:1962] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-668/2026] against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the con- cerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within seven days of release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /242