Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15545 (ALL)

RIYAZ HAIDAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22844/2026 · 2026-10-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22844 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 24.08.2026 in Case Crime No. 453 of 2026 under Sections 69, 352, 351 (2), 351 (3), 75 of BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Nawabganj, District Bareilly. (2). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned FIR dated 24.08.2026 in Case Crime No. 453 of 2026 under Sections 69, 352, 351 (2), 351 (3), 75 of BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Nawabganj, District Bareilly and no coercive steps be taken against the petitioners by the concerned police. " 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, after some length of arguments, without pressing the matter on merits prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, as advised. 3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not objected the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners for granting Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ehtesham Afsar Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Riyaz Haidar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) leave to withdraw the instant writ petition. 4. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, leave granted. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. October 7, 2026 C. MANI CRLP No. 22844 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad