Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15544 (CAL)

PRASANTA GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/4102/2025 · 2026-01-30

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30/01/2026 D/L – 14 Court No.28 S. Kundu Allowed C.R.M.(A) 4102 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Barjora P.S case no. 136 of 2025 dated 1/8/2025 under sections 85/103(1)/80/3(5) of the BNS. In the matter of: Prasanta Ghosh ...Petitioner. Mr. Proloy Bhattacharyya Mr. Koushik Roy …for the petitioner. Ms. Shila Afreen Ms. Sonali Bhar …for the State. 1. Report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 2. It appears that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner being the husband of the alleged victim, was performing his duties for the CRPF in the State of Manipur. 3. Heard the learned counsels for the parties. 4. Perused the case diary. 5. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that one of the prime accused being the mother-in-law of the victim was arrested in connection with this case and some other co-accused were granted anticipatory bail by this Court and that a charge-sheet has already been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, 2 to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The petitioner shall surrender before the jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from date. 7. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)