Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15544 (AP)

Devara Madhu Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/557/2026 · 2026-02-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV^ WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX iPRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 557 OF 2026 Between: 1. Devara Madhu Kumar, S/o. Satyanarayana, Male, aged22 years, R/o.D.No.1-154m Ward No.1, Mekavari Street, Near SaibabaTemple, Penugonda village and Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. Dasari Parasuramu, S/o. Govindu, Male 174, S.T.Peta, Komaripalem village, Biccavolu Mandal District aged39 years, R/o.D.No.3- East Godavari ...Petitioner(s) (Accused/Petitioners in CRLP 557 OF 2026 on the file of High Court) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, S.H.O. Penugonda Police Station District, High Court of A,P. at Amaravathi. rep. by its Public Prosecutor through Penugonda (M), West Godavari Guntur District. ...Respondent(s) (Complainant/Respondent in-do-)^ Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C/ Under Section 528 of BNSS^ praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds fiied in support of the' petition, the High Court Crl.P.No.557/2026 dated;4-2-2026 for may be pleased to extend the time in compliance of orders passed by this 557 of 2026, on the file of the Hon’ble Court, Pending disposal of CRLP No. High Court. * 7 > The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated 04.02.2026, made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI B P RAJU Advocate for the Petitioners and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. This application is filed seeking extension of time for compliance with the conditions imposed by this Court in Cri.P. No. 557 of 2026^ dated 04.02.2026. ^ The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the are residing in a remote viiiage and, therefore, are unable to comply with the conditions within the stipulated time. He seeks a period often (10) days to comply with the said conditions. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits may pass appropriate orders. petitioners extension of time for that the Court Considering the submissions record, this Court deems it made and upon perusai of the appropriate to extend the time for compliance. Accordingly, the time for compliance with the conditions imposed in Crl.P.No.S57 of 2026, dated 04.02.2026, is extended by a' period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. SD/- B.PRASAD RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER f /7 V ( I To, 1. The Station House Officer, Penugonda Police Station, West Godavari District 2. One CC to Sri B P Raju Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. One spare copy s PSR 1 t i I HIGH COURT DR.VJP.J DATED: 11/02/2026 ORDER lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 557 OF 2026 DIRECTION