Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15544 (ALL)

SURAJ SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/4999/2026 · 2026-10-06

Jai Prakash Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4999 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to direct the court concerned to decide the Complaint No. 1517 of 2024 (Suraj Singh vs. Rajendra Prasad Gupta), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Cantt, District Gorakhpur, expeditiously within a stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present complaint has been instituted on 17.01.2024, which is still pending. It is further submitted that as per Section 143 (3) of the N.I. Act it should be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of filing of the complaint but more than two and half years have been passed and complaint has not been decided yet. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, the court concerned is directed to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case as per Section 143 (3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties, without giving any unnecessary adjournments to either parties, if there is no other legal impediment in deciding the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application is finally disposed of. October 7, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manan Kumar Choubey, Sameer Malviya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Suraj Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad