Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15530 (ALL)

RAM SEVAK v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/16740/2026 · 2026-10-08

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16740 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to release the arrear of salary of the First Assured Career Progression (ACP) amount in favour of the petitioner along with interest as applicable. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 31.07.2026 given by the petitioner." 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 and Shri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 have contended that the grievance of the petitioner, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Nagar Ayukt, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar (respondent no.2) and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harshit Pandey Ram Sevak .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.2, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same. 5. With the aforesaid directions, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. October 9, 2026 VR WRIA No. 16740 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad