Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15529 (ORI)

KUNA JALI @ PRASANT v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/3903/2026 · 2026-05-07

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 3903 of 2026 Kuna Jali @ Prasant …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Sahu, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 07.05.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is an accused in connection with G.R. Case No.3214 of 2025, pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Berhampur, arising out of Berhampur G.R.P.S. Case No.145 of 2025, for commission of alleged offences under Section 310(2) of the BNS. 3. Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. case is pending in any other Court. 4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.483 of BNSS by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Berhampur, Ganjam, by order dated 25.02.2026 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed. 5. The Petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2026 asserting that in the meanwhile charge sheet has already p. 2 been filed and the property has been recovered. Hence, he may be released on bail. 6. The allegation against the present Petitioner is committing dacoity in a train. 7. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 8. Taking into account that the Petitioner has the following criminal antecedents i.e., GRPS Case No. 29 of 2018 under Section 380 IPC; GRPS Case No. 97 of 2023 under Sections 392/34 IPC; and GRPS Case No. 65 of 2024 under Sections 309(6)/3(5) BNS, all of which relate to offence in a train, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application of the Petitioner at this stage. 9. The Petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer before the learned Trial Court after framing of charge. If such an application is moved, same shall be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the earlier rejection or the order passed by this Court. 10. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Jina