Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15528 (GAU)

SAROJINI RAY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/5296/2026 · 2026-09-29

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010207642026 2026:GAU-AS:14622 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5296/2026 SAROJINI RAY W/O - RATNESWAR RAY R/O- DOLAIGAON (MAJPARA) P.O.AND P.S. - BONAGAIGAON. DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN-783380. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM - 781001. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (DGP) ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTER ULUBARI GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUPM ASSAM. 3:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION) ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTER ULUBARI GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BONGAIGAION BONGAIGAION. DISTRICT BONGAIGAON ASSAM. 5:THE MOTOR TRANSPORT OFFICER (MTO) POLICE RESERVE Page No.# 2/2 DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. Sarkar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 30.09.2026 Mr. N. Sarkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition in view of a formal defect, on account of non-impleadment of the District Commissioner. The learned counsel further submitted that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to re-file the writ petition after removing the said formal defect. 2. Considering the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 3. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to re-file the writ petition after removing the aforesaid formal defect. JUDGE Comparing Assistant