IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32463 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-525 Year-2025 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1. Md. Jibrail S/O Late Hadish Resident of Jorgama, Police Station- Murliganj, Dist.- Madhepura. 2. Md. Akbar @ Md. Akbal S/O Md. Jibrail Resident of Jorgama, Police Station- Murliganj, Dist.- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bambahadur Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant with iron rod and lathi due to which he sustained injury. When wife of the informant came to rescue, co-accused Md. Nabab outraged her modesty. It is also alleged that the accused persons snatched silver chain of the informant’s wife. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32463 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics and personal grudge. Further submission is that both the parties are gotiyas and due to land dispute, some scuffle took place between them. The F.I.R. has been lodged after an inordinate delay of one month without any plausible reason. He next submits that the injury to the injured does not corroborate with the prosecution’s allegation. Except one injury on wrist, other injuries are simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegation and fair antecedent of the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32463 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 3/3 No. 525 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. utkarsh/-koustav (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T