MANMOHAN KUMAR NAGPAL S/O LATE SHRI VED PRAKASH NAGPAL v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CW/584/2026 · 2026-01-28
Maneesh Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3957] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 584/2026 Manmohan Kumar Nagpal S/o Late Shri Ved Prakash Nagpal, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Plot No. 40 Sbbj Officers Colony, Near Metro Railway Station Mansarovar Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary Indira Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Deputy Commissiner Zone Prn, South First, Jaipur Development Authority Jaipur.
3. Heera Lal Kumwat S/o Laxmi Naryan Kumawat, R/o Plot No. A-31, Shiv Parvati Nagar, Village Manayavas, District Jaipur At Present Resident Of Y-88, 6-D, Engineers Colony, Manayavas, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Tailor For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 28/01/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"It is therefore prayed that the writ petition may kindly be al- lowed and the petitioner may be impleaded as respondent No.3 in the appeal bearing No.536/2023 titled Heera Lal Kumawat vs. Jaipur Development Authority and Others pending in the Court of member of Appellate Tribunal Jaipur Development Au- thority Jaipur or in alternate direction may kindly be issued to the member of the Appellate Tribunal of Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur to decide application for impleading as neces- sary party on the next date fixed on 03.02.2026 or in alternate next date in the interest of justice:- Any other relief, which may deem fit in the interest of justice may also be passed in favour of the petitioner."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the pending appeal No.536/2023, the present petitioner has filed an application
[2026:RJ-JP:3957] (2 of 2) [CW-584/2026] to be impleaded as party respondent under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC. However, despite filing the application in 2023, till date the application has not been decided by the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA. Therefore, he prays that direction may kindly be issued to the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA to decide the application filed under
Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, expeditiously, preferably in a time-bound manner.
3. Heard and considered the submissions and perused the record.
4. Record of the case reveals that the petitioner has filed the application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment before the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA on 24.11.2023 and till date, the application has not been decided. Due to pendency of the said application, right of the petitioner is seriously prejudiced, therefore, the learned Appellate Tribunal, JDA is directed to decide the application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC filed by the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of two (4) months from the next date fixed in the appeal.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the present civil writ petition stands disposed of.
6. Any other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-44