Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15518 (ALL)

AJAY SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/24350/2026 · 2026-10-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24350 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the First Information Report dated 11.08.2026 (Annexure No.-01 to the petition) lodged by respondent No. 4 in Case Crime No. 240 of 2026, under Sections 45 and 55 BNS, Police Station Kotwali Mau, District Mau. (ii) issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents Nos. 2 to 3 not to take coercive measures or arrest the petitioners in the Case Crime No. 240 of 2026, under Sections 45 and 55 of BNS, Police Station Kotwali Mau, District Mau or harass them in any manner." 2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been forwarded against petitioner nos.1 and 2 on 26.08.2026 to the Court concerned and petitioner no.3 has already been exonerated by the investigating agency. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ajay Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State that the charge sheet has already been forwarded against petitioner nos.1 and 2 and petitioner no.3 has already been exonerated as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 24350 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad