KANCHAN RAJ PRASAD ALIAS KANCHAN RAI PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2855/2026 · 2026-06-02
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15515 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15515 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:15893 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A No. 2855 of 2026 Kanchan Raj Prasad @ Kanchan Rai Prasad ... Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Diwakar Sippy, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. For the Informant
: Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate
---
Order No. 02/ Dated: 2nd June, 2026
Heard Mr. Diwakar Sippy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned P.P. assisted by Mr. Vikas Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the informant.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No. 93 of 2026.
3. It has been alleged that the petitioner who was an employee in the Biome Coaching Institute run by the informant had obtained a loan of Rs. 25,00,000/- under the Chief Minister Employment Scheme from the Jharkhand State Tribal Cooperative Development Corporation Ltd., Ranchi by forging the signature of the informant as a guarantor.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the verification was made and the documents were found to be proper. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent.
5. Mr. Vikas Pandey, learned counsel for the informant has submitted that on account of the forging of the signature of the informant by the petitioner, he is facing a threat of prosecution on account of the amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- which was obtained by the petitioner as loan under the Chief Minister Employment Scheme from the Jharkhand State Tribal Cooperative Development Corporation Ltd., Ranchi.
6. Regard being had to the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.
7. This application stands rejected.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
Dated: 2nd June, 2026
Vedanti/-
Uploaded on 5th June, 2026