KULDEEP SINGH S/O PAAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/757/2026 · 2026-01-16
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15514 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15514 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1882] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 757/2026 Kuldeep Singh S/o Paal Singh, R/o Udaipur, District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Singh for Mr. S.S. Sunda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 16/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0526/2025 registered with the Police Station Bhiwadi, District Bhiwadi for offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 329(4) & 352 of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 5 & 25 of Arms Act.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and so also the material made available on record.
4. The accused-petitioner is said to be in custody since 04.12.2025, and there are cross cases in between the parties and the alleged incident took place all of a sudden because of some land dispute. It is also submitted that there is no specific overt act
[2026:RJ-JP:1882] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-757/2026] assigned to the petitioner of causing any grievous injury on the vital part of the body of the member of the injured complainant party.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that there is no specific overt act assigned to the petitioner of causing any grievous injury on the vital part of the body of the member of the injured complainant party and the petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /273