114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** ARB-173-2026 Date of Decision: 16.04.2026 Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. ..... Applicant Versus M/s Temflo System (P) Ltd. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for the applicant. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the legal notice which was issued by the applicant to the respondent vide Annexure P-9 does not in clear terms convey invocation of the arbitration clause and therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the present application in order to enable the applicant to satisfy the essential condition for invoking the provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by issuance of fresh notice under Section 21 of the Act in accordance with law and thereafter, in case necessity so arises, seeks liberty to file a fresh in accordance with law. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 16.04.2026 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) Bhumika JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No 2. Whether reportable: Yes/No BHUMIKA BHATI 2026.04.17 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh