VINAY KUMAR AND ANR v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER REVENUE DEPTT AND ANR
WP(C)/1796/2026 · 2026-06-22
Sanjay Parihar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1551 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1551 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 36
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 1796/2026
Vinay Kumar and another
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K and another …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Meharban Singh, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 22.06.2026
1. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the matter is under consideration before the District Magistrate, Kathua, wherein a motion has been laid for grant of sanction of CLU (Commercial Land Use), which earlier was granted to the attorney holder Bhanu Partap Singh, S/o Sh. Pyar Singh, R/o Village Tarda, Tehsil and District Kathua. After the demise of owner Puran Chand, the petitioners have step into his shoes and are seeking that the sanction be granted.
2. Be that as it is, since the matter is under consideration of respondent No. 2, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No. 2 to consider the case of petitioners by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order.
3. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE
Jammu:
22.06.2026. Shafqat