Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1551 (HP)

LAC v. ASHOK KUMAR

CMP/5855/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD Vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors. CMPs No. 5855 & 5858/2026 in RFA No. 416/2011 01.04.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the non-applicants/appellants. Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. CMP No. 5855/2026 The present application under Order 1, Rule 10, read with Section 151 CPC has been maintained by the applicants for deletion of name of respondent No. 3, Belu, who expired on 07.07.2016 and substitution of applicants in his place. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of one of the applicants namely Tule Ram, death certificate of the deceased as well as legal heirs certificate. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned Deputy Advocate General for the non- applicants/appellants has no objection in case the same is allowed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, more particularly para-4 thereof, the same is allowed and the applicants, as mentioned in the application, are substituted as parties in the present proceedings in place of deceased respondent No. 3. The application stands disposed of. ….2... CMP No. 5858/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 3(a) to 3(k), for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned Deputy Advocate General for the non- applicants/appellants has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as the matter stands amicably settled before the National Lok Adalat on 12.12.2015. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that the matter stands amicably settled before the National Lok Adalat on 12.12.2015, the same is allowed and the compensation amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 3(a) to 3(k), as per their respective shares, after proper ….3... verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in para-5 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 1st April, 2026 (raman)