APHC010035172015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 642/2015 Between: 1. K.PADMANABHA REDDY, S/O SRI NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS R/O F-488, RTPP COLONY, V.V.REDDY NAGAR POST YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT 516312 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K VIJAYANAND, MANAGING DIRECTOR A.P.POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD. (APGENCO) VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD 500082 2. SRI A V RAO, DIRECTOR (HR & IR) A.P.POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD (APGENCO) VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD 500082 3. MS V USHA, JOINT SECRETARY (PERSONNEL), APGENCO, VIDHYUTH SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to initiate contempt proceedings and punish the respondents for disobedience of orders of the Honble High Court passed in W.P.No. 9208 of 2014 dated 15.12.2014 by the Honble Sri Justice R.Kantha Rao under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 357 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner by recruitment by transfer to the post of Assistant Manager (HR) on par with Mohd. Fassiuddin Feroz and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(APPL 367 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent No.3 as respondent No.3 in CC.No.642 of 2015 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SUDHA RANI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO ) 2. K ARUNA(SC FOR APGENCO) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- In view of the dismissal of W.P.No.9208 of 2014, the contempt case also deserves to be closed. 2. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 09.03.2026 PNS