Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15508 (JHR)

MANWAR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4762/2026 · 2026-06-02

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15912 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4762 of 2026 ---- Manwar Ansari …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Adv. For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwary, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 02nd June, 2026 1. Heard Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. 2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.50 of 2026. 3. The petitioner and some other accused persons were apprehended by the police as they were suspected to be involved in cyber-crime. From the possession of the petitioner one mobile phone with SIM Card was recovered. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint. It has further been submitted that one case of cyber-crime was instituted against the petitioner earlier but he has been acquitted in the said case. The petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2026. 5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Regard being had to the above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, cyber-crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.50 of 2026, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated: 02nd June, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 05.06.2026