Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15507 (AP)

Telekula Vijaya Kumari v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1794/2019 · 2026-02-04

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010038762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1794/2019 Between: 1. TELEKULA VIJAYA KUMARI, W/O LATE DILLESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O 12-2-51, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, PALASA, KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. A 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the subordinates of the respondent authorities in threatening to dispossess the petitioiner from her lawful possession in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 5.00 cents and Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy.No. 67/Part and 467/2 situated at Boddupadu village, Palasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, without any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under the Statute as being 2 illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to take any coercive steps without following the due process of Law, and to grant such other relief or reliefs IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the subordinates of the respondent authorities not to dispossess or in any manner interfees,with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 5.00 cents and Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy.No. 67/Part and 467/2 situated at Boddupadu village, Palasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 18-02-2019 passed in IA. 1/2019 in WP. 1794/2019 and dismiss Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JOSEPH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) on 03.02.2026, seeking permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.02.2026 KAS 4 179 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1794/2019 Dated: 05.02.2026 KAS