Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15505 (MAD)

Sundaram v. The Commissioner of Police

CRL OP/6630/2026 · 2026-03-16

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 6630 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 6630 of 2026 Sundaram ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Salem, Salem District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Karipatty Police Station, Salem District. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioner during the course of the investigation based on representation dated 05.03.2026 except due process of law and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner: Mr.P. Dasarathan For Respondents: Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioner during the course of the investigation, except in due process of law, based on the representation dated 05.03.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6630 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed this petition as the police having been knocking on the doors of the petitioner at odd hours, which cause disturbance to the petitioner’s reputation. He further submitted that knocking on the door at odd hours is not permitted. Hence, the petition has been filed. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has two sons residing with him, who are history sheeters in H.S.No.5 of 2023 (Harisivan) and H.S.No.6 of 2023 (Kulanthaivel). Hence, in search of the history sheeters, the police visited the petitioner’s house. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submitted that the petitioner’s sons are residing in Chennai, while the petitioner is residing in Salem. The petitioner undertakes to appear before the 2nd respondent and furnish the details of his sons on 23.03.2026 without fail. 5. This Court is of the view that searching for history sheeters cannot be termed as harassment. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6630 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 16-03-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No AT To: 1.The Commissioner of Police, Salem, Salem District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Karipatty Police Station, Salem District. 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6630 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR J. AT CRL OP No. 6630 of 2026 16-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis