APHC010035692017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1911/2017 Between: 1. D. NIRMALA KUMARI,, W/O JAYA RAO AGED 54 YEARS, TELUGU PANDIT GR. I S.V. SCHOOL FOR DEAF, TIRUPATHI RIO TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL IAS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TRIUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM,TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. SRI M RAMACHANDRA, DEVASTHANAMS EDUCATIONAL OFFICER (FAC), TIRTUNALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. SMT A NALINA, PRINCIPAL (FAC), S.V. SCHOOL FOR DEAF, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. SRI A V DHARMA REDDY, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. SRI M BHASKAR REDDY, DEVASTHANAMAS EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 6. SRI N V RAMANA MURTHY, PRINCIPAL, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. RR 4 TO 6 IMPLEDED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.29/11/2022. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2022. IN CC NO.1911 OF 2017. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to punish the Respondents herein under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their intentional, willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dt.26.07.2017 in WPMP No.30711 of 2017 in WP No. 24787 of 2017 passed by the Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S RAMACHANDRA RAO and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K KOUTILYA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V.DYUMANI (SC for TTD) The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 26.07.2017 passed in W.P.M.P. No.30711 of 2017 in W.P. No. 24787 of 2017. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K. Koutilya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the respondents have complied with the interim orders passed by the Court. 3. Smt. V. Dyumani, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent TTD, is present. 4. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.03.2026 GVK 3 213 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.1911 of 2017 Date: 10.03.2026 GVK