Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15505 (ALL)

KARTAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/22971/2026 · 2026-10-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22971 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 to 4 to conclude the fair investigation in pursuance of first information report dated 30.07.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 818 of 2026, U/S 115(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station Majhola, District Moradabad within stipulated period. (ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 3 and 4 to arrest of the respondent no. 5 accordance with law." 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Vinanjay Kumar Patel, learned counsel for respondent no. 5 and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material on record. 3. Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. submitted that in instant matter after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been submitted to the Court concerned and the Court concerned has treated the same as complaint case vide order dated 09.09.2026. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted before the court concerned and no objection made by learned AGA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Joshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vinanjay Kumar Patel Kartar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) appearing on behalf of the State as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 5, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2026 SK Srivastava CRLP No. 22971 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad