Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15503 (RAJ)

ANJU GURJAR D/O KAMLESH GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/53/2026 · 2026-01-22

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3105] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 53/2026 1. Anju Gurjar D/o Kamlesh Gurjar, Aged About 19 Years, R/ o Shree Ram Colony, Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Siyaram Gurjar S/o Govinda Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Shekhpura, Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Dausa. 4. The SHO, Police Station Papadda, District Dausa. 5. Janshiram Gurjar S/o Baduchand Gurjar, Residing At Village Sarjoli, Police Station Rani Ji Khava, District Dausa. 6. Moolchand Gurjar S/o Baduchand Gurjar, Residing At Village Sarjoli, Police Station Rani Ji Khava, District Dausa. 7. Gyanchand Gurjar S/o Baduchand Gurjar, Residing At Village Sarjoli, Police Station Rani Ji Khava, District Dausa. 8. Raghuveer S/o Laduram, Residing At Village Mundaksya, Police Station Papadda, District Dausa. 9. Pramod S/o Raghuveer, Residing At Village Mundaksya, Police Station Papadda, District Dausa. 10. Kamal Singh Gurjar S/o Laxminarayan Gurjar, R/o Ram Nagar Colony, Chanda Hotel, Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sharda Bai Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 10 as [2026:RJ-JP:3105] (2 of 2) [CRLW-53/2026] they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Lal Kothi, Tonk, Jaipur on 22.12.2025 and same has been registered on 23.12.2025. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 10 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station, Papadda, District Dausa and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /240