Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010204812026 2026:GAU-AS:14577 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2823/2026 ABDUL MUTLIB AND ABDUL MOTLIB SON OF LATE RUSTOM ALI, VILLAGE- PATHAKHAURI, WARD NO.10, P.O. CHERAGI, P.S - RATABARI, DIST- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S DAS, P J DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, -BEFORE- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 30.09.2026 Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. S. Das, learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Addl. PP for the State 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying Page No.# 2/3 for grant of bail to the accused applicant in connection with Ratabari P.S. Case No. 135/2026 registered under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/319(2)/308(7)/317(4)/351(2)351(3)/111/3(5)/3(6)/3(9) of the BNS, 2023 corresponding to G. R. Case No.846/2026. 3. An FIR was lodged on 05.09.2026 by one Ripon Paul before the Officer-in-charge of Ratabari Police Station alleging that the accused applicants along with some other persons have been deceiving vulnerable people in general by impersonating themselves as Police Officers or other professionals fraudulently in the name of comprising various offences. It is alleged that the accused applicants are fraudsters and many victims, whom the Police has to find out. 4. On receipt of the FIR, the Police registered the Ratabari P.S. Case No. 135/2026 under the aforementioned sections. 5. The learned Senior Counsel submits that there is no specific allegation and there is no victim found as yet. It is also stated that there is no record of monetary transaction in the instant case and the allegation made are totally vague. In view of the aforesaid, the learned Senior Counsel submits that since the accused applicant is behind the bar for the last 21 days, the accused applicant should be granted bail, at this stage. 6. The Case Diary in the instant case has been produced and the same has been perused. 7. The learned Addl. PP has opposed the bail prayer of the accused applicant. Page No.# 3/3 8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts that since there is no specific allegation against the accused applicant as well as no victim could be located and the accused applicant is already behind the bars for the last 21 days, this Court is of the considered opinion that the accused applicant should be released forthwith on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with a surety of like nature to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Sribhumi, Assam subject to conditions that: (i) that the accused applicant shall cooperate with the investigation and shall make himself available as and when called for; and (ii) that the accused applicant shall not try to hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner, whatsoever. 9. Case Diary to be sent back. 10. In terms of the aforesaid, this Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Talom Tali, Private Secretary