Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1550 (KAR)

SRI B RAJESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22446/2025 · 2026-02-26

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12098 WP No. 22446 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 22446 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI B RAJESH S/O. SRI B. SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3-146-14-5D3. CHOWDESHWARINAGAR, N.G. PALLI, MADANAPALLI, ANDHRA PRADESH-517 325. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESHKUMAR K N, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD,BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12098 WP No. 22446 of 2025 KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, BANGALORE NORTH (ADDNL.) TALUK,SHARAVATHI BUILDING, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU-560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT (THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE) DATED 06-07-2021 VIDE NO.ALN/CR/14/2021-22 AND ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO DELETE THE ENTRIES MADE IN THE R.T.C. COLUMN 11 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 12.02.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections, failing which, list this matter on 26.02.2026 for dismissal." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12098 WP No. 22446 of 2025 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE SSD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12