1 2026:CGHC:2953-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 196 of 2026 1 - Himalaya @ Niraj Bhoi S/o Satyanarayan Bhoi Aged About 30 Years R/o H.No. 321, Ward No. 64, Piyush Nagar Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Satyanarayan Bhoi S/o Dinbandhu Bhoi Aged About 60 Years R/o H.No. 321, Ward No. 64, Piyush Nagar Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Saraswati Bhoi W/o Satyanarayan Bhoi Aged About 55 Years R/o H. No. 321, Ward No. 64, Piyush Nagar Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Thorugh P.S. Mahila Thana, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Barkha Soni D/o Ajay Soni Aged About 31 Years R/o Piyush Nagar Malsaay Talab Ke Pichhe Kushalpur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19.01.2026 MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.01.20 11:29:36 +0530 2 1. None appeared on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner to press this present petitioner on repeated calls. 2. Heard Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent / State. 3. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that the petition may kindly be allowed and the F.I.R. no. 08/2025 & Charge sheet no. 16/2025 (Annexure P-1), Registered by police station Mahila thana Raipur, (C.G) and its consequential prosecution, for the offences punishable under sections- 498A, 34 of IPC may kindly be quashed, in respect to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 4. From perusal of the present petition, it transpires that the same has been reported to be suffering from various defects / defaults as pointed out by the Registry of this Court. 5. Learned State counsel submits that the prayer made in the present petition is also defective as the particulars of the charge- sheet has not been mentioned with respect to date of filing and further, the order taking cognizance has neither been annexed, nor been challenged. 6. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the counsel for the 3 petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Specialized Adoption Agency Bemetara (C.G.), for wasting the precious time of this Court. 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet