Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15492 (ALL)

GUDDU ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35739/2026 · 2026-10-06

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35739 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Mohammad Asif, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.411 of 2026, Under Sections 318(4), 317(2), 112(2), 3(5), 338 of B.N.S., and 66(D) of Information Technology Act, Police Station- Katghar, District Moradabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that not a single penny has been transferred to the account of the applicant and that the applicant has no criminal history, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Guddu Ansari, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 7, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Asif Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Krishan Pahal,J.) Guddu Ansari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad