BUNTY GURJAR S/O GOVIND KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/730/2026 · 2026-01-16
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1917] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 730/2026 Bunty Gurjar S/o Govind Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Mangalpura, Police Station Kanwas, District Kota, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Paliwal for Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 16/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.200/2025 registered at Police Station Kanwas, District Kota Rural for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the complainant party in the alleged incident are found to be simple in nature and the accused- petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2026.
[2026:RJ-JP:1917] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-730/2026]
5.
Learned counsel also submits that the co-accused, namely, Suresh Kumar has already been enlarged on bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 16.12.2025.
6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the accused-petitioner is named in the FIR.
7. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the injury sustained by the complainant party are found to be simple in nature, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
8. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /272