Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2026 DAILYLAW 15486 (KAR)
SRI K B SHIVAKUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/4688/2026 · 2026-04-22
S R Krishna Kumar
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15486 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15486 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4688 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. K.B. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O NO.15, SAI SHREE AGS LAYOUT, NEW BEL ROAD BANGALORE-560 054.
2.
MR. FEROZE KHAN S/O MR. MUSHTHAK KHAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O NO.28/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD VENKATARAHGAPURAM GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560 003. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH, STATION HOUSE OFFICER HIGH GROUNDS POLICE STATION BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001.
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
2
2.
MR. PHANIRAJ KASHYAP S/O MR. JUSTICE (RETD) K. SREEDHAR RAO AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/O NO.29, SEVEN MINISTERS' QUARTERS SANKEY ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DIVAKAR MADDUR, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. KUMARA K.G., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CR.P.C (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR BEARING NO.219/2013 REGISTERED WITH THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HIGH GROUNDS POLICE STATION; WHEREIN, THE PETITIONERS HEREIN IS ARRAIGNED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS 389, 469, 506, 120B R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC CURRENTLY RE-NUMBERED AS CC NO.20735/2013 AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and learned counsel for respondent No.2 and perused the material on record. 2. A perusal of the material on record would indicate that on 29.07.2013, the second respondent/defacto complainant filed a complaint registered in Crime
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
3 No.219/2013 for the alleged offences punishable under Section 506, 34, 120B, 389 and 469 of IPC. In pursuance of the said complaint, respondent No.1/police authorities conducted investigation and filed a charge sheet which is now pending adjudication in CC No.20735/2013 in which charges have been framed against the petitioners. Aggrieved by the impugned proceedings in C.C.No.20735/2013, petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 are before this Court by way of the present petition. 3. Before adverting to the rival contentions, it would be necessary to extract the impugned complaint at Annexure A1 which reads as under: To,
Date:29-7-2013 Station House officer, High Grounds Police station, Bangalore
From,
Phaniraj Kashyap, No.29 Ministeres Quarters Sankey Road Bangalore
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
4 My land bearing survey no 49/2 was acquired by the KIADB, the award was passed before the payment of the compensation by KIADB one Shivkumar filed a suit in OS No.1010/2007 before Civil Judge in Devenahalli for partitions against his father. Obvoiusly to share the compensation, the suit was not legally tenable and the said suit against me came to be withdrawn and dismissed. In the meantime one Shivkumar and other filed a PTCL case that it is a granted land, and that the same is to be forfeited and restored to them. The AC in case No. 17/2012-13 dismissed the application made by Shivkumar and others under the PTCL act order dated 5/7/2013. Shivkumar and others filed appeal before the DC on 10/7/2013 before that I had made an application to KIADB to pay the compensation. Sri Chokkareddy and for Shivkumar and others who made an appeal, appeared before LAO KIADB objected payment of compensation to me. That his clients have filed appeal before DC and they could secure the stay. The LAO posted for hearing objection on 17/7/2013 to hear the parties regarding payment. On that day Sri Chokkareddy filed objections that no stay is granted but appeal is filed therefore objected payment.
Since there was no stay the LAO ordered payment of compensation to me and the same is accordingly paid. - -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
5
On 26th July 2015, one Srinivas who works in advocate office as clerk met Badrinath who is working as clerk in Chambers of my father Justice K Shreedhar Rao gave a copy a copy of the Writ petition which is proposed to be filed and said the advocate Shivkumar and one Firoz advocate clerk are interested in the settling the matter out of court. In the copy of the writ petition given to me there are wild allegations on my father Justice K Sheedhar Rao that he has influenced DC on 11/7/2013 and that a stay which was granted by the order dated 10/7/2013 has been tampered by DC and he has struck off the order of grant of stay and passed an order of issuance of notice to hear and grant of stay. One said tampering of the order is alleged to have been made on 11/7/2013, in support of the said contention in the copy of given writ petition Chokkareddy has filed affidavit to the effect that he has seen the order of DC granting stay was passed on 10/7/2013, and later on 11/7/2013 he came to know some foul play. Infact on 11-7-2013 my clerk raju had gone to DC office to file caveat and I have got the acknowledgement of filing the caveat petition. On the basis of the order passed by DC which contains scoring of order of grant of stay coupled with the affidavit of advocate Chokkareddy false and wild allegations are made. The intention of Shivkumar advocate and Firoz advocate clark is not to really file the writ petition is
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
6 only to black mail me and to bring disrespect to my father Justice K Sreedhar Rao.
On this day Shivkumar proposed to come and talk to me regarding the terms. He proposed that he would pay check for Rs. 1 crore 24 lakhs and that I should make admission in the appeal before DC for remand for AC so that they can manage a favorable
order before AC. I was totally not agreeable to the terms, In fact after getting the copy of the proposed writ petition. I also filed caveat before the High Court on 27-7-2013.
In fact Advocate Shivkumar and Firoz came to my office around 9:00pm in Maruti Swift car bearing No Ka 04 MD 4012, Srinivas (clerk) who is also present at my office, Advocate Shivkumar proposed the above terms and when I refused, he went away stating that they will filing the said Writ petition tomorrow. However I have detained Srinivas in my Office.
I have also bought Srinivas along with this complaint to the Police Station. I request you to take action against Advocate Shivkumar and Firoz advocate clerk, working at Sri K N Phanindra Advocate office and also Advocate Chokkareddy having office at no 204, 2nd Floor, Amar Towers 1" cross 1st main Gandhinagar, Bangalore for swearing a false affidavit.
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
7 Because Advocate Chokkareddy never disclosed the
facts of grant of stay by DC on 10/7/2013 and the tampering the order by DC on 11/7/2013 in his objection statement before the LAO KIADB which is filed by him on 17-07-2013. After lapse of more than 10 days he comes up with a false version in the affidavit. I request you to take action against Advocate Shivkumar, Firoz, Advocate Chokkareddy, tulsamma, gammamma and shivkumar with common intention of committing offense of extortion, threatening, criminal conspiracy, criminal intimidation and fabricating documents. Phaniraj Kashyap
4. As stated supra, in pursuance of the impugned complaint, the police authorities conducted investigation and filed charge sheet and it would be necessary to extract the same as under:
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
8 zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥Àt ¥ÀvÀæ £ÀªÀÄÆ£É ¸ÀASÉå:157 f¯Éè: ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ
zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¸ÀASÉå -
¢£ÁAPÀ: 05/12/2013 ¥ÉÆÃ°¸ï oÁuÉ: ºÉÊ UËæAqïì
¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ªÀiÁ»w ¸ÀASÉå – 219/2013
¢£ÁAPÀ: 29/07/2013
1. zÀÆgÀÄ CxÀªÁ ªÀiÁ»w ¤ÃrzÀªÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ, «¼Á¸À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÀÈwÛ: ²æÃ ¥sÀtÂgÁeï PÀ±Àå¥ï ©£ï PÉ.²æÃzsÀgï gÁªï, 27 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA29, ¸ÉªÉ£ï «Ä¤¸ÀÖgï PÁél¸Àð, ¸ÁåAQ gÀ¸ÉÛ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ. «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¹zÀ D¥Á¢vÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «¼Á¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ vÀ¯É ªÀÄgɹPÉÆAqÀªÀgÀÆ ¸ÉÃjzÀAvÉ §A¢ü¹gÀ° CxÀªÁ §A¢ü¸À¢gÀ° «ZÁgÀuÉUÉ M¦à¹®èzÀ D¥Á¢vÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «¼Á¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ (vÀ¯É ªÀÄgɹPÉÆAqÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß PÉA¥ÀÄ ±Á»AiÀİè UÀÄgÀÄw¹) 2 ªÀ±ÀzÀ°è gÀĪÀªÀ gÀÄ 3 eÁ«ÄãÀÄ ªÉÄÃ¯É CxÀªÁ ªÀÄÄZÀѽPÉ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É 4 J°è AiÀiÁªÁUÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ AiÀiÁjAzÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀįÁ¬ÄvÉA§ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ¸ÀéwÛ£À (zÉÆgÉvÀ DAiÀÄÄzsÀUÀ¼ÀÆ ¸ÉÃjzÀAvÉ) «ªÀgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁåf¸ÉÖçÃljUÉ PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¯ÁVzÉAiÉÄÃ? 5 ²æÃAiÀÄÄvÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÁzÀ ¸ÁQëUÀ¼À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «¼Á¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ 6 D¥ÁzÀ£É CxÀªÁ ªÀiÁ»w ªÀÄvÀÄÛ C¥ÀgÁzsÀzÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CzÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À «ªÀgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. 7 PÀ®A 389, 469, 506, 120(©), 193, 420, gÉ/« 511, 34 L.¦.¹
(DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå 1539 & 1540) (¦.JA.281) (¥ÉÆÃ°Ã¸ÀjUÉ ¤ÃrzÀ ªÀiÁ»w)
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
9 J-7 CªÀÄÈvÉñï J£ï.¦ ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï ¥ÀÄlÖ¸Áé«Ä J£ï.¹. 54 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA7, 1£Éà ªÀĺÀr, ¥ÀgÀPÁ¯ï ªÀÄoï ©°ÝAUï, ªÉÄeɹÖPï, ¨ÉA-09 ªÀÄ£É «¼Á¸À- C£ÀÄUÀæºÀ ¤®AiÀÄ, £ÀA.1/1, 7£Éà PÁæ¸ï, PÀÄgÀħgÀ ºÀ½î, eÉ. ¹ £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉÃA- 83.(zÀ¸ÀÛVj ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀÅ¢®è) ------------- J-1. PÉ.© ²ªÀPÀĪÀiÁgï ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï §¸ÀªÀgÁeï, 55 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.2, 1£Éà ªÀĺÀr, 5£Éà ªÉÄãï, 6£Éà PÁæ¸ï, ªÀįÉèñÀégÀA, ¨ÉA. (ªÀiÁ£Àå GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ eÁ«ÄãÀÄ ¥Àr¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ)
1. C¸À®Ä zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ
2. ¸ÀܼÀ ¥ÀAZÀ£ÁªÉÄ. 3. ¦gÁåzÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÀÄgÀÄ zÀÆgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ºÉZÀÄѪÀj PÀ®AUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÉÃj¹PÉÆ¼Àî®Ä ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ ¤ÃrzÀ ªÀÄ£À« ¥Àæw. 4. ¦gÁåzÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÀÄgÀÄ ºÉýPÉ ¢.03/08/2013
5. ¦.¥sï £ÀA.54/2013. 6. ¦.¥sï £ÀA.55/2013. 7. ¦.¥sï £ÀA.56/2013 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀAZÀ£ÁªÉÄ ¢.31/07/2013. 8. ¦.¥sï £ÀA.56/2013 gÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ºÁqïð r¸ïÌ £ÀÄß N¥À£ï ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä dgÀÄV¹zÀ ¥ÀAZÀ£ÁªÉÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸Éʧgï oÁuÉ gÀªÀgÀÄ ¤ÃrzÀ j¥ÉÆmïð. 9. ²æÃ. ¨Á®PÀȵÀÚ gÀªÀgÀ ºÉýPÉ ¢.31/07/2013.
¸ÁQë-1 : ²æÃ ¥sÀtÂgÁeï PÀ±Àå¥ï ©£ï PÉ.²æÃzsÀgïgÁªï, 27 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.29, ¸ÉªÉ£ï «Ä¤¸ÀÖgï PÁél¸ïð, ¸ÁåAQ gÀ¸ÉÛ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-2 : ²æÃ. ²æÃ¤ªÁ¸ï ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï ¥Á¥ÀtÚ, 40 ªÀµÀð, zÀ§Æè-34, §¸À¥Àà UÁqÀð£ï, ¥ÉÊ¥ï ¯ÉÊ£ï, ªÀįÉèñÀégÀA, ¨ÉA – 03. ¸ÁQë-3 : ²æÃ. gÁeï PÀĪÀiÁgï ©£ï §¸ÀªÀtÚ¥Àà, 34 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.288, 1£Éà PÁæ¸ï, ²æÃ±ÉÊ® £ÀUÀgÀ, ¥ÀmÉÃUÁgï ¥Á¼Àå, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-4 : ²æÃ. ²ªÀ¸ÀAPÀgÀ¥Àà ©£ï JA. wªÀÄä¥Àà, 50 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.20/09, 11£Éà PÁæ¸ï, ºÉZï.¹zÀÝAiÀÄå gÀ¸ÉÛ, «®Õ£ï UÁqÀð£ï, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-5 : ²æÃ. PÉ. ¥À¼À¤ ©£ï PÀtÚ£ï, 53 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.107, 1£Éà PÁæ¸ï, ¨sÀQë UÁqÀð£ï, n.¹.JA gÁAiÀÄ£ï gÀ¸ÉÛ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-6 : ²æÃ. ¦ ¨Á®PÀæµÀÚAiÀÄå ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï ¥ÉÆ£À߸Áé«Ä, 64 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.J¯ï-37 Q¯ÉÆÃð¸ÀÌgï PÁ¯ÉÆÃ¤, 3£Éà ºÀAvÀ, §¸ÀªÉñÀégÀ £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-7 : ²æÃ. gÁeÉÃAzÀæ ©£ï ¥À¼À¤, 42 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.30, 8£Éà ªÀÄÄRå gÀ¸ÉÛ, ªÀ¸ÀAvÀ £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-8 : ²æÃ. ©ºÀÄ ©£ï ¨sÁ¸ÀÌgÀ£ï £ÁAiÀÄPï, 42 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.30, 1£Éà ªÀĺÀr, 8£Éà ªÀÄÄRå gÀ¸ÉÛ, ªÀ¸ÀAvÀ £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA -52. F zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖAiÀÄ CAPÀt-2 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 4 gÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀĪÀ DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀjUÉ ¨ÉzÀjPÉ ºÁQ MvÀÛqÀ vÀAzÀÄ CPÀæªÀĪÁV ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀjAzÀ PÉÆÃmÁåAvÀgÀ gÀÆ¥Á¬Ä ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÁzÀ£É ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ KPÉÆÃzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ ¢:26/07/2013 gÀAzÀÄ C¥ÀgÁ¢üPÀ M¼À¸ÀAZÀÄ gÀƦ¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀÄ 2005 gÀ°è ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ GvÀÛgÀ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, eÁ¯Á ºÉÆÃ§½, ©.PÉ. ¥Á¼Àå UÁæªÀÄzÀ ¸ÀªÉÃð £ÀA§gï 49 gÀ°èAiÀÄ 6 JPÀgÉ d«Ää£À°è JgÀqÀÄ JPÀgÉ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¹.ºÉZï £ÁgÁAiÀÄt ¸Áé«Ä EªÀgÀ PÀÄlÄA§¢AzÀ ±ÀÄ¢Ý PÀæAiÀÄPÉÌ Rjâ¹ ¸Áé¢üãÀ C£ÀĨsÀªÀzÀ°èzÀÝ d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÉÃð £ÀA.49/2 JAzÀÄ PÉÆqÁVzÀÄÝ, EzÀ£ÀÄß 2006 gÀ°è PÉ.L.J.r.© AiÀÄÄ ¸Áé¢üãÀ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀªÀgÀÄ D¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀÄÝ, £ÀAvÀgÀ ¢:25/09/2008 gÀAzÀÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ¨sÀƸÁé¢üãÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj d«ÄãÀ£ÀÄß PÉ.L.J.r.© UÉ ¸Áé¢ü£À¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ §UÉÎ PÀÄjvÀÄ CAwªÀÄ C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£É ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀÄÝ. CzÀgÀAvÉ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀjUÉ gÀÆ 1 PÉÆÃn 24 ®PÀë gÀÆ. UÀ¼ÀÄ PÉ.L.J.r.© ¬ÄAzÀ ¥ÁªÀw ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä DzÉñÀªÁVzÀÄÝ. F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀÄ ¢:18/07/2013 gÀAzÀÄ ¥ÀrzÀÄPÉÆArzÀÄÝ, F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÄ£À: ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀjAzÀ PÉ.L.J.r.© UÉ »AwgÀÄV¸ÀĪÀAvÉ DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MvÁ۬ĹzÀÄÝ. ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß »AwgÀÄV¹zÀgÉ. (ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉ¢zÉ) f¯Éè: ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ £ÀUÀgÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉ : ºÉÊUËæAqïì zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥Àt¥ÀvÀæ ¸ÀASÉå – ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ªÀiÁ»w ªÀgÀ¢ ¸ÀASÉå: ªÉÆ.¸ÀA.219/2013, PÀ®A.389,469,506,120(©) 193,420, gÉ/« 511, 34 L.¦.¹. ªÀiÁåf¸ÉÖçÃlgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt ¸ÀASÉå: ¸ÀgÀPÁgÀzÀ «gÀÄzÀÝ D¥Á¢vÀgÀ (ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ) J-1. PÉ.©.²ªÀPÀĪÀiÁgï J-2. ¦ügÉÆÃeï SÁ£ï, J-3. ZÉÆÃPÁ gÉrØ J-4. ²æÃªÀÄw. vÀļÀĸÀªÀÄä, J-5. ²æÃªÀÄw. UÀAUÀªÀÄä J-6.²ªÀPÀĪÀiÁgï, J-7. CªÀÄÈvÉñï,
¥sÀ°vÁA±À: ‘J’
- -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
10 PÁ®A £ÀA.4 ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉ¢zÉ. PÁ®A £ÀA.5 ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉ¢zÉ. PÁ®A £ÀA.6 ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉ¢zÉ.
PÁ®A £ÀA.7 ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉ¢zÉ. J-2. ¦ügÉÆÃeï SÁ£ï ©£ï ªÀÄĸÁÛPï SÁ£ï, 38 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.28/1, 2£Éà ªÀÄÄRå gÀ¸ÉÛ, 4£Éà PÁæ¸ï, ªÉÄAPÀlgÁªÀÄ ¥ÀÄgÀ, ¥Áå¯É¸ï UÀÄlÖºÀ½î, ¨ÉA. (ªÀiÁ£Àå 8£Éà J.¹.JA.JA. £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ eÁ«ÄãÀÄ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.) J-3. ZÉÆÃPÁ gÉrØ ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï ¨Á.ZÁ gÉrØ, 35 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.204, 2£Éà ªÀĺÀr, CªÀÄgï lªÀgï, 1£Éà PÁæ¸ï, 1£Éà ªÉÄãï, UÁA¢ü £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA. (ªÀiÁ£Àå GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ eÁ«ÄãÀÄ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.). J-4. ²æÃªÀÄw. vÀļÀ¸ÀªÀÄä PÉÆA. ¯ÉÃmï ªÀÄĤ¸ÁéªÀÄAiÀÄå, 75 ªÀµÀð, ©.PÉ ¥Á¼Àå eÁ¯Á ºÉÆÃ§½, ¨ÉA. J-5. ²æÃªÀÄw. UÀAUÀªÀÄä PÉÆA. ¤Ã®UÀAn ªÀÄĤAiÀÄ¥Àà, 58 ªÀµÀð, ©.PÉ ¥Á¼Àå eÁ¯Á ºÉÆÃ§½, ¨ÉA. J-6. ²ªÀPÀĪÀiÁgï ©£ï ªÀÄĤ¸ÁéªÀÄAiÀÄå, 40 ªÀµÀð, ©.PÉ ¥Á¼Àå eÁ¯Á ºÉÆÃ§½, ¨ÉA. (J-4, J-5, J-6 DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁ£Àå 22£Éà J¥sï,n.¹ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ eÁ«ÄãÀÄ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄvÁÛgÉ.). 10. ¦.J¥sï £ÀA.55/2013 gÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ¹.r AiÀÄ£ÀÄß Transcript ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ¢AzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀ C£ÀĪÀÄw ¥Àæw. 11. ¦.J¥sï £ÀA.57/2013, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀAZÀ£ÁªÀÄ ¢:02/08/2013. 12. DgÉÆÃ¦ ¦ügÉÆÃeï SÁ£ï zsÀé¤AiÀÄ£ÀÄß gÉPÁqïð ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÀAzsÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è dgÀÄV¹zÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀ ¥ÀAZÀ£ÁªÀÄ. 13. ²æÃ. §¢æ£Áxï gÁªï gÀªÀgÀ ºÉýPÉ. 14. ²æÃ. ²æÃ¤ªÁ¸ï gÀªÀgÀ ºÉýPÉ, ¢:30/07/2013. 15. ²æÃ. ²æÃ¤ªÁ¸ï gÀªÀgÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀ ºÉýPÉ, ¢:28/08/2013. 16. ²æÃ. © ²ªÀ¸Áé«Ä gÀªÀgÀ ºÉýPÉ, ¢:06/08/2013. 17. ²æÃ. «ÃgÀ£ÁUÀ¥Àà gÀªÀgÀ ºÉýPÉ, ¢:06/08/2013. 18. ²æÃ. ¥ÀÄ®PÉò gÀªÀgÀ ºÉýPÉ. 19. DgÉÆÃ¦ ¦ügÉÆÃeï SÁ£ï ¸Àé-EZÁÑ ºÉýPÉ ¢:30/07/2013. 20. ¦.J¥sï ¸ÀASÉå:56/20213 gÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆAqÀ ºÁqïð r¸ïÌ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjÃQë¹ lÆæxï ¯Áå¨ï C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ j¥ÉÆÃmïð. 21. ¦.J¥sï ¸ÀASÉå:55/20213 gÀ°è CªÀiÁ£ÀvÀÄÛ¥Àr¹PÉÆArzÀÝ DgÉÆÃ¦ ¦ügÉÆÃeï SÁ£ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÁQëÃzÁgÀgÁzÀ ²æÃ¤ªÁ¸ï £ÀqÀÄªÉ £ÀqÉzÀ ¸ÀA¨sÁµÀuÉAiÀģɯ߼ÀUÉÆAqÀ ¹.r r¸ÀÌ£À°ègÀĪÀ zsÀé¤AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀjÃQë¹ lÆæxï ¯Áå¨ï C¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ j¥ÉÆÃmïð. ¸ÁQë-9 : ²æÃ ªÀÄzsÀÄ ©£ï ªÀiÁgÀ¥Àà, 35 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.817, 4£Éà PÁæ¸ï, 2£Éà ªÉÄãï, J£ï.f.N.J¸ï PÁ¯ÉÆÃ¤, PÀªÀįÁ £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA – 79. ¸ÁQë-10 : ²æÃ. «±Àé£Áxï ©£ï £ÁgÁAiÀÄuï gÁªï, 42 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.19/1, 4£Éà PÁæ¸ï, 4£Éà ªÉÄãï, ªÀÄwÛPÉgÉ, AiÀıÀªÀAvÀ¥ÀÄgÀ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-11 : ²æÃ. §¢æ£Áxï gÁªï. r ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï £ÁUÀgÁeï gÁªï 34 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.145/65, 4£Éà ªÀÄÄRå gÀ¸ÉÛ, , 3£Éà ¨ÁèPï, vÁåUÀgÁd £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA. ¥ÀmÉÃUÁgï ¥Á¼Àå, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-12 : ²æÃ. ²æÃ¤ªÁ¸ï ©£ï aPÉÌUËqÀ, 31 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.16, 1£Éà ªÀĺÀr, 5£Éà ªÀÄÄRå gÀ¸ÉÛ, 6£Éà ºÀAvÀ, ªÉ¸ïÖ D¥sï PÁqïð gÀ¸ÉÛ, ªÀĺÁUÀ£À¥Àw £ÀUÀgÀ, gÁeÁf £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-13 : ²æÃ. «ÃgÀ£ÁUÀ¥Àà ©£ï ¯ÉÃmï ºÀ£ÀĪÀÄAvÀ¥Àà, 65 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.1, 105/4, NAPÁgÀ ¤®AiÀÄ, 1£Éà ªÉÄãï, 9£Éà J PÁæ¸ï, PÉAUÉÃj G¥À £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-14 : ²æÃ.
© ²ªÀ¸Áé«Ä ©£ï ©ÃgÉÃUËqÀ, 35 ªÀµÀð, «±ÉõÀ ¨sÀƸÁé¢ü£Á¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ-2, £ÀA.14/3, gÁµÉÆæöÖÃvÁÜ£À ¥ÀjµÀvï PÀlÖqÀ, ªÉ¸ïÖ«AUï, 1£Éà ªÀĺÀr, £ÀÈ¥ÀvÀÄAUÀ gÀ¸ÉÛ, PÉ.L.J.r.©, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-15 : ²æÃ. ¥ÀÄ®PÉò, JA ©£ï ZÀ£Àß§¸À¥Àà, 31 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.212/10, 2£Éà PÁæ¸ï, 2£Éà ªÉÄãï, «£ÁAiÀÄPÀ £ÀUÀgÀ, CUÀr D¸ÀévÉÛ ºÀwÛgÀ, «®ì£ï UÁqÀð£ï, ¨ÉA ¸ÁQë-16 : J¸ï ¤ÃgÀÆ, lÆæxï ¯Áå¨ï °. 2£Éà ªÀĺÀr, E£ÉÆáÃmÉPï PÁA¥ÉèPïì, £À A.5/42, vÁªÀgÉPÉgÉ ªÀÄÄRå gÀ¸ÉÛ, PÉÆÃgÀªÀÄtUÀ®, ¨ÉA. £ÁAiÀÄPï, 42 ªÀµÀð, £ÀA.30, 1£Éà ªÀĺÀr, 8£Éà ªÀÄÄRå gÀ¸ÉÛ, ªÀ¸ÀAvÀ £ÀUÀgÀ, ¨ÉA -52. ¸ÁQë-17 : ²æÃ. PÉ.JA. gÀªÉÄñÀ, ¦.L, ºÉÊUËæAqïì ¥ÉÆÃ°Ã¸ï oÁuÉ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÁQë-18 : ²æÃ. F.©.²ÃzsÀgÀ ¦.L, ºÉÊUËæAqïì ¥ÉÆÃ°Ã¸ï oÁuÉ, ¨ÉA. ¸ÀzÀj d«Ää£À ¥ÀƪÀð ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀjAzÀ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV ªÁ¥Á¸ÀÄì PÉÆr¸ÀĪÀÅzÁV MvÁÛAiÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ, DgÉÆÃ¦vÀgÀ ªÀiÁwUÉ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀÄ M¥ÀàzÉ EzÀÝ°è ¸ÀzÀj d«Ää£À ªÉÄÃ¯É ¸ÀļÀÄî zsÁªÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÀÆr ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀvÀézÀ §UÉÎ UÉÆAzÀ®ªÀÅAlÄ ªÀiÁr PÉ.L.J.r.© ¬ÄAzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀ ¥ÀjºÁgÀ ºÀtzÀ°è DgÉÆÃ¦vgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ CPÀæªÀĪÁV zËdð£Àå¢AzÀ ¨sÁUÀ ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄ®Ä C¥ÀgÁ¢üPÀ M¼À¸ÀAZÀÄ ªÀiÁr ¢:29/07/2013 gÀAzÀÄ gÁwæ 9:00 UÀAmÉUÉ ºÉÊUËæAqïì ¥ÉÆÃ°Ã¸ï oÁuÁ ¸ÀgÀºÀ¢Ý£À ²æÃPÀAoÀ¥Àà ¯ÉÃOmï, PÉæ¸ÉAmï gÀ¸ÉÛ, £ÀA.15/1 PÀlÖqÀzÀ 1£Éà ªÀĺÀrAiÀİègÀĪÀ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀ PÀbÉÃjUÉ J-1, J-2, DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉÆÃV gÀÆ.1 PÉÆÃn 24 ®PÀë ºÀtzÀ ¸ÀzÀj d«Ää£À ¨Á§ÄÛ ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ZÁ°ÛAiÀİègÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÁAiÀÄPÀ G¥À «¨sÁUÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ ªÀUÁð»¸À®Ä DgÉÆÃ¦vÀgÀÄ ¸À°è¸ÀĪÀ CfðUÀ½UÉ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀÄ DPÉëÃ¥ÀuÉ ¸À°è¸ÀzÀAvÉ ¤¨sÀAzÀ£ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁr MvÁÛAiÀÄ¥Àr¹zÀÄÝ, EzÀPÉÌ M¥Àà¢zÀÝ°è ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀÄ EªÀgÀ vÀAzÉAiÀĪÀgÁzÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ¢üñÀjUÉ PÀvÀðªÀå ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÀĪÀ UËgÀªÁ¤évÀ ²æÃ.PÉ.²æÃzsÀgï gÁªï gÀªÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀļÀÄî PÀvÉ PÀnÖ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀ vÀAzÉAiÀĪÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀļÀÄî DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁr CªÀgÀ WÀ£ÀvÉ UËgÀªÀPÉÌ PÉlÖ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ vÀgÀĪÀÅzÁV ¸ÀļÀÄî jmï CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀiÁ£Àå UËgÀªÁ¤évÀ GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ¸À¤ß¢AiÀÄ°è ¸À°è¸ÀÄvÉÛêÉAzÀÄ DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀ UËgÀªÀPÉÌ ZÀÄåw ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÁV ¨ÉzÀjPÉ ºÁQzÀÝ®èzÉ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀ ¥ÁætPÉÌ ¨ÉzÀjPÉ ºÁQ ¨sÀAiÀĪÀÅ£ÀÄßAlÄ ªÀiÁr ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀjAzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ PÉÆÃmÁåAvÀgÀ gÀÆ¥Á¬Ä ºÀtÀªÀ£ÀÄß C¥ÀæªÀiÁtÂPÀªÁV ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁ£ÀÆ£ÀÄ ¨Á»gÀªÁV ªÉÆÃ¸À¢AzÀ ®¥ÀmÁ¬Ä¸À®Ä J-1 jAzÀ J-7 DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼ÀÄ AiÀÄwß¹gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è ®¨sÀåªÁzÀ ¸ÁPÁëöåzÁgÀUÀ½AzÀ zÀÈqÀ¥ÀnÖgÀÄÀvÀÛzÉ. DzÀÝjAzÀ DgÉÆÃ¦UÀ¼À «gÀÄzÀÝ ªÉÄîÌAqÀ PÀ®A C£ÀéAiÀÄ F zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ ¥ÀnÖ. - -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21948 CRL.P No. 4688 of 2026
11
5.
As can be seen from the impugned complaint, charge sheet material comprising of the properties, witnesses etc., I am of the considered opinion that the same would necessarily have to be dealt with by the trial Court during the course of the trial. Under these circumstances, in the light of the complaint, FIR, charge sheet material, properties, statements of witnesses etc., I am of the view that the present petition does not warrant interference at the hands of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or Section 482 Cr.P.C. Under these circumstances, I do not find any merit in the petition and the same is thereby dismissed. All rival contentions kept open to be decided by the trial Court in accordance with law and no opinion is expressed on the merits/demerits of the case. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
DKB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23