Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15482 (CHH)

Smt. Fagni Bai v. Sitara Begum

CRR/819/2017 · 2026-01-15

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2761 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 819 of 2017 1 - Smt. Fagni Bai W/o Late Shri Asthir Ram, Aged About 70 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Jangalpara Nagri, P. S. and Tahsil Nagri, Civil & Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Beniram S/o Asthir Ram, Aged About 57 Years R/o Bhaismundi, P. S. Magarlod, Civil and Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Alok Sinha S/o Bhuwan Lal, Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Nagri, P. S. and Tahsil Nagri, Civil and Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - Sitara Begum W/o Md. Rafiq Musalman, R/o Jangalpara, Nagri, P. S. and Tahsil Nagri, Civil and Revenue District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., 2 - State of Chhattisgarh through the District Magistrate, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For the petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer For respondent no.1 : Mr. Rahim Ubwani, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Order on Board 16/01/2026 ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Digitally signed by ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Date: 2026.01.18 12:41:22 +0530 2 This revision has been filed u/s 397, 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned order dated 04.07.2017 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhamtari in Cr.A. No. 34/2017 arising out of the order dated 28.03.2017 passed by the JMFC, Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G) in Criminal Complaint Case No.551/2006. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter is called out in second round. The matter is of the year 2017. Since no one appears for the petitioner despite repeated calls, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the revision for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao